What legal remedies are available when a factoring or bill discounting arrangement goes into default?
I discounted my business invoices with an NBFC factor, but the buyer has not paid and the factor is now demanding the full amount from me. What is my liability under a factoring arrangement? I have been reading conflicting things online and I would like to understand what Indian law actually says about this, which Act and Section applies, what the realistic timelines and costs are, and what I should be doing right now to protect my position. If the matter can be resolved without litigation I would prefer that route, but I want to know what my rights are before I agree to anything or sign any document.
What legal remedies are available when a factoring or bill discounting arrangement goes into default? is governed in India primarily by Factoring Regulation Act 2011, Section 3, Factoring Regulation Act 2011, Section 7 and Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Section 138. The short answer is set out below, followed by the practical steps most people in this situation need to take. Read it alongside the specific provisions named, because the exact relief available to you turns on the facts you can prove on paper.
The Factoring Regulation Act 2011 governs assignment of receivables to a factor, and Section 3 requires factoring companies to be registered with the RBI to carry on this business legally.
Section 7 of the Act deals with notice of assignment to the debtor, and once proper notice is given, the debtor is bound to pay the factor directly, discharging the original assignor of that specific receivable.
Whether the transaction is 'with recourse' or 'without recourse' is the key factor determining liability, since a with-recourse arrangement allows the factor to fall back on the assignor if the buyer defaults, while a without-recourse arrangement shifts that credit risk entirely to the factor.
If the factoring agreement is with-recourse and the seller issued a cheque or promissory note as additional security, its dishonour can attract proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 in addition to a civil recovery suit.
Bill discounting, unlike factoring, involves the discounting bank purchasing a negotiable instrument at a discount, and liability of the discounting party depends on the endorsement terms and whether recourse was excluded on the bill.
What to do next: 1) Check whether your factoring agreement is with-recourse or without-recourse to establish your exposure; 2) Verify that proper notice of assignment was given to the buyer as required under Section 7 of the Factoring Regulation Act 2011; 3) If a cheque issued as security has bounced, respond promptly to any Section 138 notice received; 4) Negotiate a repayment plan with the factor while pursuing recovery separately from the defaulting buyer.
If the other side has already issued a notice, filed a case or set a deadline, treat the matter as time-sensitive — most remedies under Factoring Regulation Act 2011, Section 3 carry limitation periods, and a delay you cannot explain weakens an otherwise strong case. You can post the details on the MyVakeel forum for a practising advocate to review, or book a paid consultation with a Bar Council verified lawyer in this practice area.
Disclaimer: This information is for general awareness and does not constitute legal advice. Statutes and their interpretation change, and outcomes depend on the facts of your case. Please consult a qualified advocate before acting on it.