What is honest concurrent use under Section 12

Question

I need to understand my rights and options in India regarding: what is honest concurrent use under section 12. I have been reading conflicting things online and I would like to understand what Indian law actually says about this, which Act and Section applies, what the realistic timelines and costs are, and what I should be doing right now to protect my position. If the matter can be resolved without litigation I would prefer that route, but I want to know what my rights are before I agree to anything or sign any document.

MyVakeel Legal Desk · Accepted Answer

What is honest concurrent use under Section 12 is governed in India primarily by Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 12 and Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 11. The short answer is set out below, followed by the practical steps most people in this situation need to take. Read it alongside the specific provisions named, because the exact relief available to you turns on the facts you can prove on paper.

Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 12 is the primary statutory anchor for this issue, and its language must be read together with the surrounding provisions of the same Act, since Indian courts interpret these definitions and procedural sections strictly and technical non-compliance can be fatal to an otherwise good case on merits.

Where more than one statute is relevant, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 11 supplies an additional layer of rights or obligations, and applicants and rights holders should not assume that satisfying one Act's requirements automatically satisfies the other, since the definitions, timelines and remedies under each Act are independent of one another.

Procedural compliance matters as much as substantive entitlement in Indian IP practice — filing forms correctly, meeting statutory deadlines for responses, oppositions or renewals, and maintaining contemporaneous documentary evidence of use, ownership or creation are what typically decide contested proceedings before the Registry or in court, not just the underlying merit of the claim.

Enforcement, once rights are established, generally proceeds either through the specific remedy scheme under Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 12 or through a composite civil suit before the Commercial Court or High Court having jurisdiction, seeking injunction, damages or account of profits, and rights holders should weigh the cost, time and evidentiary burden of each route before choosing how to proceed.

What to do next: 1) Identify the exact statutory provision and Registry or court that governs your specific situation; 2) Gather and preserve documentary evidence of ownership, use, or creation dated as early as possible; 3) Meet every procedural deadline for filing, response or renewal without waiting for a reminder; 4) Consult a lawyer experienced in Indian intellectual property practice before committing to a strategy.

If the other side has already issued a notice, filed a case or set a deadline, treat the matter as time-sensitive — most remedies under Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 12 carry limitation periods, and a delay you cannot explain weakens an otherwise strong case. You can post the details on the MyVakeel forum for a practising advocate to review, or book a paid consultation with a Bar Council verified lawyer in this practice area.